Free PDF Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione
Yeah, reviewing a book Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione can add your close friends listings. This is among the formulas for you to be effective. As recognized, success does not indicate that you have terrific things. Comprehending and also recognizing greater than various other will certainly offer each success. Close to, the notification as well as impression of this Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione could be taken and also selected to act.
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione
Free PDF Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione
Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione. Pleased reading! This is exactly what we really want to state to you who like reading a lot. Exactly what about you that assert that reading are only commitment? Don't bother, reading behavior must be begun with some specific reasons. One of them is reading by responsibility. As what we wish to provide here, the e-book entitled Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione is not sort of required publication. You could enjoy this e-book Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione to check out.
Occasionally, reviewing Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione is very boring and it will take long time beginning with obtaining guide and begin checking out. Nonetheless, in modern-day era, you could take the creating modern technology by making use of the internet. By web, you can see this web page and also start to look for guide Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione that is needed. Wondering this Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione is the one that you need, you can go with downloading. Have you comprehended how you can get it?
After downloading the soft data of this Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione, you could start to read it. Yeah, this is so delightful while somebody needs to read by taking their huge books; you remain in your brand-new means by just handle your gadget. Or perhaps you are operating in the workplace; you can still use the computer system to review Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione totally. Obviously, it will certainly not obligate you to take several web pages. Merely page by web page depending upon the time that you need to review Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione
After knowing this quite easy method to read and get this Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione, why do not you tell to others concerning through this? You could inform others to visit this website and choose searching them preferred publications Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione As recognized, below are great deals of listings that supply numerous type of books to accumulate. Merely prepare couple of time and internet links to get the books. You could really take pleasure in the life by reviewing Faulkner And Hemingway: Biography Of A Literary Rivalry, By Joseph Fruscione in an extremely simple way.
In the first book of its kind, Joseph Fruscione examines the contentious relationship of two titans of American modernism—William Faulkner and Ernest Hemingway. At times, each voiced a shared literary and professional respect; at other times, each thought himself the superior craftsman and spoke of the other disparagingly. Their rivalry was rich, nuanced, and vexed, embodying various attitudes—one-upmanship, respect, criticism, and praise. Their intertextual contest—what we might call their modernist dialectic—was manifested textually through their fiction, nonfiction, letters, Nobel Prize addresses, and spoken remarks.Their intertextual relationship was highly significant for both authors: it was unusual for the reclusive Faulkner to engage so directly and so often with a contemporary, and for the hypercompetitive Hemingway to admit respect for—and possible inferiority to—a rival writer. Their joint awareness spawned an influential, allusive, and sparring intertext in which each had a psychocompetitive hold on the other. Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry—part analytical study, part literary biography—illustrates how their artistic paths and performed masculinities clashed frequently, as the authors measured themselves against each other and engendered a mutual psychological influence. Although previous scholarship has noted particular flare-ups and textual similarities, most of it has tended to be more implicit in outlining the broader narrative of Faulkner and Hemingway as longtime rivals. Building on such scholarship, Faulkner and Hemingway offers a more overt study of how these authors’ published and archival work traces a sequence of psychological influence, cross-textual reference, and gender performance over some three decades.
- Sales Rank: #3011372 in Books
- Published on: 2015-05-29
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.02" h x .61" w x 5.98" l, .89 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 272 pages
Review
“Joseph Fruscione takes a long and always responsible look at the important and fascinating subject of the Faulkner-Hemingway rivalry, demonstrating along the way that there were losses to both writers, but, however perversely it seems to be, there were also enormous gains for their writing. It contributes significantly to the scholarship on these two literary giants, as well as shedding light on the intriguing ways rivalry can diminish the individual who writes the book even as it spurs him on to do more and often enough write better books.” —George Monteiro, professor emeritus of English, Brown University
“In his carefully and systematically researched book, Joseph Fruscione provides Faulkner and Hemingway scholars and students with what I qualify as the definitive study on the lifelong relation between the two writers. He provides insights not only into the various ways Faulkner’s and Hemingway’s careers intersected, but also into the implications that such intersections had for the shaping and evolution of American Modernism.” —Manuel Broncano, professor of American literature, Texas A & M International University
“Joseph Fruscione’s study is the best, most balanced account ever produced of the artistic relationship between William Faulkner and Ernest Hemingway. Their careers dominate twentieth-century American literature, and, as this book shows, the example and work of each writer informed and influenced that of the other. Both men recognized the value of the other, and Fruscione goes a long way toward explicating the complexities of admiration and jealousy on the part of both. Fruscione is not a partisan of either writer; his book is one of sound, objective scholarship and writing.” —Robert W. Trogdon, Kent State University
About the Author
Joseph Fruscione is adjunct professor of English at Georgetown University and adjunct assistant professor of First-Year Writing at George Washington University.
Most helpful customer reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful.
Writers Behaving Badly
By David Anderson
Fruscione's book is more interesting than most biographies of literary figures for one simple reason: it's about the books. Most bios start out with the parents, the hometown, the siblings, then progress to the marriages, the travels, the houses, the lovers, the divorces, the children, the vices, and everything else you never wanted to know. Sometimes biographers even touch on how their subjects got the ideas for their books. Sometimes not. A recent bio of Jack London devotes more space to London's introduction to surfing on a trip to Hawaii than it does to Martin Eden or The Call of the Wild.
This book is focused on the bitter literary rivalry between William Faulkner and Ernest Hemingway and--most important of all--how this rivalry affected what they wrote. I knew the two had a rivalry, but Fruscione convincingly demonstrates how deeply and pervasively this rivalry inserted itself as the subtext in so many of their greatest books: The Wild Palms, The Unvanquished, Death in the Afternoon, the hunting stories, Requiem for a Nun, The Old Man and the Sea, A Fable, Across the River and into the Trees, and The Dangerous Summer, to name but a few. There is also relevant and interesting discussion of the rivalry as it surfaced in their letters, public statements, and Nobel Prize addresses. The analysis is detailed and illuminating--and also by far the main focus of the book. This is not a gossip volume; it is literary analysis. There are certain aspects of the writings of both men that you will never fully understand if you have not read this book. That makes this book essential if you are serious about coming to grips with either of these amazingly gifted writers.
Both men realized that they were the leading candidates for the title of America's most important writer of the 20th Century, and both realized that they were each other's main rival for the title. Fruscione deftly shows how this seems to have brought out the worst in both of them. Both men were capable of notable generosity of spirit, just not with each other. Occasionally they tried to show some basic humanity in their dealings with each other, but it always seemed to end in willful misreading of each other, followed by vindictive reply, recrimination, apology, snide asides, and a repitition of the whole cycle again. Both were capable of humor, but the story in its entirety is ultimately tragic. Had they been friends instead of vicious competitors, both might well have achieved even more than they did.
Fruscione gives the edge in achievement to Faulkner and the edge in competitiveness to Hemingway. Sadly, all three--Faulkner, Fruscione, and--saddest of all--Hemingway, seem to have forgotten what Hemingway wrote in the first chapter of Green Hills of Africa: "There is no order for good writers" (p. 22).
I found only a very few of what I consider to be proofreading errors (often omitted words) on the following pages: 157, 165, 188, 197, 199, 201, and 238. I found no errors of fact in the book. Every once in a great while there's something like "a diverse, nuanced, and paradigmatic American modernism that echoed the intertextuality and occasional animus seen in European modernism" (p. 151) or "Such talk of and obsession with particularly mythic animals textures the dynamic of the hunters' communities" (p. 228). (Lamentably, my own animus with the tedium of late 20th-Century literary theory has probably textured the dynamic of my reactions to these sentences.) However, aside from such rare lapses into dissertationese, Fruscione's prose is lucid and easy to follow. If you have read Hemingway and/or Faulkner, you'll have no trouble with this. Well, like me, you might have trouble putting it down.
The book has no dust jacket. Everything normally found on the jacket is on the front and back covers. The volume itself is solidly constructed. If you have online access to an academic database, a comprehensive and thoughtful review, written by Neil Stubbs, of Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry may be found in the Spring 2013 issue of The Hemingway Review.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
The editor should be lashed because this could be a great book. Each min-essay should be diagramed for content ...
By Seth W
This book is both fascinating and extremely frustrating. There are numerous redundancies that wear on the reader (me) after a while. The editor should be lashed because this could be a great book. Each min-essay should be diagramed for content and the paragraphs summarized and labeled for theme or lead idea. How many times do we need to be proven that Faulkner and Hemingway are "aware" of each other or each other's creative powers. Most people who admire these two writers understand this aspect intuitively. How could they not be? How many times do we need to be told in the extremely long introduction that "this sort of book has never been written?" I guess seven times is a charm.
However, once the book is rolling the correspondence and competitive aspect of their relationship was a lot of fun to read and the author is obviously a scholar worthy of his mighty subjects and he is equip enough for the task for us to trust him.
A minor quibble (but very annoying to the OCD, which I gather will be your main audience for such a book) : I do not see the purpose for the word, "psychocompetitive" nor do I see the need to cram it in every other paragraph. It's one of those words that seems a bit to close to a portmanteau and the word "competitive" would work just fine in most cases. It would be less wearying for the reader to constantly materialize the meaning of this word and apply it fittingly or in the way the author desires. After all, "competitive" is a wonderful word that encompasses all the Freudian and Jungian baggage the author needs to drive home the point. Most athletes will tell you that nearly all of real competition on the field or court is psychological so it ends up being a redundant word used within redundant thesis statements. Perhaps "influence" might do fine as well?
All in all, I'm enjoying the book and picking cherries on every page and the cherries are delicious. I think it could be trimmed a good 30-40% and offered as a nice paperback or handbook of sorts. The subject matter is delightfully petty, even though the author argues that the competition drove the creativity of the two authors, thereby elevating this dynamic to a standard worthy of dissertation. I get it; I really just want to hear what they said about each other and how much they wanted to knock the hell out of each other in the literary ring. It could stand to be rewritten in less lofty, less dissertation-y prose and to be trimmed of its redundancies.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
I enjoyed the book
By D. M. Wilson
Readability: Difficult to Moderate. Full of academic language: few common phrases and cliché's. Concise, clear language. No explicit words found, save for those quoted by Hemingway and Faulkner.
Novel Premise: Engaging! What happens when two literary giants live and write during the same era? A passive-aggressive rivalry, of course, and one that's quite entertaining. It traces the different eras of the modernist period, starting with interactions with Sherwood Anderson, and pushing on past military service, into the eventual end of each author. There are plenty of comparisons with letters, off-hand comments, and - yay! - Faulkner's addressing his class, ranking Hemingway in a list of 'the best' writers - but not ranking him highly. There are also comments from the author's about other writers (Steinbeck, for instance). Interesting and well-planned.
Overall Impression: I enjoyed the book. It's an academic book written by an academic, so we're not ranking the prose within the novel, nor are we really concerned about narration - although, in this case, there is a few idiosyncrasies that stick out, such as the use of the term 'psychocompetative'. This is a term the author made up. I'm a literary major myself, and I looked into it - even checked with my professors - and, apparently, the only person to ever use this term (so far as I can find in the university library and online database) is Fruscione, himself, who coined the term without any head-nod from a psychology department - and the term is repeated too often. The point, though, is that the book looks into the psychological states of both men, as it relates to their competition once both were aware of the other, and the book makes it fun, which is important. I was excited to receive it in the mail, excited to read it, and I'm excited to have read it.
Literary Merit: This is not a textbook, but a book about writers which one finds in most textbooks about literature. As such, it has merit in that it's a study (one of the few) about the exchange between Hemingway and Faulkner's, exploring both their similarities and their differences. If I were to write an academic paper on this topic, this is a book I'd reference.
The Bottom Line: Great for Hemingway and Faulkner fans (I'm a Faulkner fan, myself). Great for people interested in the modernist period, or in the mindset behind two separate and distinct writing styles. Good for someone who is looking to be entertained, or for someone who is interested in actually making a study out of the content. Not good for someone bored by academic writing, biographies, or those that despise indirect conflict. Not good for OCD academic types, who can't let go and enjoy a thing for what it is (I'm not this type, luckily!). I liked the book and rated it four stars out of five.
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione PDF
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione EPub
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione Doc
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione iBooks
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione rtf
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione Mobipocket
Faulkner and Hemingway: Biography of a Literary Rivalry, by Joseph Fruscione Kindle
No comments:
Post a Comment